<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Give or Sell Links on Your Blog? Google WILL Stop You&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/</link>
	<description>Peanuts to Profits With Thor Schrock</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: h0bbel.p0ggel.org</title>
		<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>h0bbel.p0ggel.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/#comment-842</guid>
		<description>[...] Thor Schrock: Give Give or Sell Links on Your Blog? Google WILL Stop You… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thor Schrock: Give Give or Sell Links on Your Blog? Google WILL Stop You… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh the Aspie</title>
		<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh the Aspie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Rob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dropping Text Link Ads - h0bbel</title>
		<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Dropping Text Link Ads - h0bbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/#comment-845</guid>
		<description>[...] Thor Schrock: Give Give or Sell Links on Your Blog? Google WILL Stop You… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thor Schrock: Give Give or Sell Links on Your Blog? Google WILL Stop You… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/#comment-848</guid>
		<description>They reset monthly unless you set them otherwise, inside the file. I think it&#039;s to deter people from trying to get free back links. I disabled that on mine since most people who *comment regularly* on my blog (i.e my subscribers) aren&#039;t in it for the links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They reset monthly unless you set them otherwise, inside the file. I think it&#8217;s to deter people from trying to get free back links. I disabled that on mine since most people who *comment regularly* on my blog (i.e my subscribers) aren&#8217;t in it for the links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshtheAspie</title>
		<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshtheAspie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/#comment-846</guid>
		<description>It would be the other way around. Your commentators would be paying you for a back link by generating free content for you, since you are talking about selling links.

Though really, it would just be a &quot;thank you&quot; or &quot;appreciation&quot; link, the same way that you link to people who let  you borrow great content from their blogs, or base a post off of one of theirs.

Although I am a bit curious about a few things. First of all, your top commentator plug in seems to have reset it&#039;s numbers. I may have missed the post relating to this, but when did that happen, and why? Does it only count comments with a certain amount of recency?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be the other way around. Your commentators would be paying you for a back link by generating free content for you, since you are talking about selling links.</p>
<p>Though really, it would just be a &#8220;thank you&#8221; or &#8220;appreciation&#8221; link, the same way that you link to people who let  you borrow great content from their blogs, or base a post off of one of theirs.</p>
<p>Although I am a bit curious about a few things. First of all, your top commentator plug in seems to have reset it&#8217;s numbers. I may have missed the post relating to this, but when did that happen, and why? Does it only count comments with a certain amount of recency?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry Conn</title>
		<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry Conn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/#comment-843</guid>
		<description>Thor, I really do have a lot to learn about this though... As Andy Beard says, I am a typical victim of Google FUD. Unfortunately, I am not financially in a position to argue with Google. My finances depend on it. And that is scary. Since this post, I have been working my tail off towards taking additional measure of balancing out my traffic across the board on all my site. Granted, Google is the leader in the search engines. Granted, Google supplies me with the most traffic on my sites... but, there are other means of gaining a good solid balance of traffic. This is my priority now... having something to fall back on. Because at this current state of my sites, if I were to lose Google... things wouldn&#039;t be good.

My site just made it out of the sandbox. I am very pleased with the results. I can now write articles and have them actually appear in the SERPs. I have worked very hard to get my personal site to this level. Unfortunately, I may have lost readers because of the changes I have made. These changes would have been in place a long time ago if I knew had know better how Google worked. As it stands now with my site is I will openly add just about any great quality blog into my super HUGE blogroll so that my readers and visitors (who are now also coming from Google) can have the opportunity to click and view the list and click on blogs that interest them. However, I have modified my Wordpress install to include the rel=nofollow on my blogroll. I have over 85 links in my categorized blogroll. These number will continue to climb as bloggers continue to request to have their site added. Having that large amount of links on every page within my site (especially the individual post pages) puts a huge drain on my ability to have my own content indexed. The blogroll is there for readers and pass by readers to get linked up with great quality blogs. My blogroll is NOT there to aid others with gaining PageRank. PageRank can be achieved when a blogger writes excellent things and other bloggers willingly link to the post and or to the home page of the blogger.

The Good news, which everyone SHOULD be happy about is the fact that I have modified my Wordpress install and I have actually OPENED up my individual post pages by removing the rel=nofollow.

Long story short... I have done the opposite what a typical Wordpress install has. Out of the box, Wordpress does not have NOFOLLOW on the blogroll but does have NOFOLLOW on the comments.

I have reversed this... I have NOFOLLOW on my irrelevant links which reside in my blogroll and have opened up links in my comments. The comments are from readers who read my blog and have sites that have a logical relevancy to my site. The people that comment on my site are contributors and they should be rewarded. I have lost a few readers due to the complexity of what I am doing with this site... however, everything I am doing is in the interest of my readers.

This will buy me time until I can figure out how to properly configure Spam Karma, as Andy Beard suggested. Once this is done... I guess I am more able to tightly control my external links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thor, I really do have a lot to learn about this though&#8230; As Andy Beard says, I am a typical victim of Google FUD. Unfortunately, I am not financially in a position to argue with Google. My finances depend on it. And that is scary. Since this post, I have been working my tail off towards taking additional measure of balancing out my traffic across the board on all my site. Granted, Google is the leader in the search engines. Granted, Google supplies me with the most traffic on my sites&#8230; but, there are other means of gaining a good solid balance of traffic. This is my priority now&#8230; having something to fall back on. Because at this current state of my sites, if I were to lose Google&#8230; things wouldn&#8217;t be good.</p>
<p>My site just made it out of the sandbox. I am very pleased with the results. I can now write articles and have them actually appear in the SERPs. I have worked very hard to get my personal site to this level. Unfortunately, I may have lost readers because of the changes I have made. These changes would have been in place a long time ago if I knew had know better how Google worked. As it stands now with my site is I will openly add just about any great quality blog into my super HUGE blogroll so that my readers and visitors (who are now also coming from Google) can have the opportunity to click and view the list and click on blogs that interest them. However, I have modified my WordPress install to include the rel=nofollow on my blogroll. I have over 85 links in my categorized blogroll. These number will continue to climb as bloggers continue to request to have their site added. Having that large amount of links on every page within my site (especially the individual post pages) puts a huge drain on my ability to have my own content indexed. The blogroll is there for readers and pass by readers to get linked up with great quality blogs. My blogroll is NOT there to aid others with gaining PageRank. PageRank can be achieved when a blogger writes excellent things and other bloggers willingly link to the post and or to the home page of the blogger.</p>
<p>The Good news, which everyone SHOULD be happy about is the fact that I have modified my WordPress install and I have actually OPENED up my individual post pages by removing the rel=nofollow.</p>
<p>Long story short&#8230; I have done the opposite what a typical WordPress install has. Out of the box, WordPress does not have NOFOLLOW on the blogroll but does have NOFOLLOW on the comments.</p>
<p>I have reversed this&#8230; I have NOFOLLOW on my irrelevant links which reside in my blogroll and have opened up links in my comments. The comments are from readers who read my blog and have sites that have a logical relevancy to my site. The people that comment on my site are contributors and they should be rewarded. I have lost a few readers due to the complexity of what I am doing with this site&#8230; however, everything I am doing is in the interest of my readers.</p>
<p>This will buy me time until I can figure out how to properly configure Spam Karma, as Andy Beard suggested. Once this is done&#8230; I guess I am more able to tightly control my external links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor Schrock</title>
		<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Thor Schrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/#comment-844</guid>
		<description>It looks like Google is taking this a step further and Bloggers are starting to pay attention.  My friend Garry Conn has a post on the immediate changes he is making to his blog to reduce the risk of peoblems with Google:

http://www.garryconn.com/its-googles-way-or-the-highway.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Google is taking this a step further and Bloggers are starting to pay attention.  My friend Garry Conn has a post on the immediate changes he is making to his blog to reduce the risk of peoblems with Google:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.garryconn.com/its-googles-way-or-the-highway.php" >http://www.garryconn.com/its-googles-way-or-the-highway.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyNing</title>
		<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyNing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/#comment-841</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Google is doing something that is fair.  For all intends and purposes, they monetize their blog by posting paid links also.

It&#039;s almost like the US government making a legislation saying that companies will be taxed more if they buy ads from cable television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Google is doing something that is fair.  For all intends and purposes, they monetize their blog by posting paid links also.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost like the US government making a legislation saying that companies will be taxed more if they buy ads from cable television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Kingston</title>
		<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Kingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/#comment-835</guid>
		<description>The more I think about this the better I think it will be in the long run. I just feel sorry for all the people who have built entire careers and businesses around paid links.

It&#039;s pretty obvious that it needs doing at the moment - It&#039;s next to impossible to find a good website designer these days... Those guys have backlinks pouring out of their ears and it&#039;s obviously making it harder to find them.

Personally I don&#039;t care how big Google gets - they are still the best search engine out there at the moment and they&#039;ve done so much for the internet.

As for their monopolistic plans - by devaluing link exchanges and paid links, they&#039;ll effectively generate more adwords customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I think about this the better I think it will be in the long run. I just feel sorry for all the people who have built entire careers and businesses around paid links.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty obvious that it needs doing at the moment &#8211; It&#8217;s next to impossible to find a good website designer these days&#8230; Those guys have backlinks pouring out of their ears and it&#8217;s obviously making it harder to find them.</p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t care how big Google gets &#8211; they are still the best search engine out there at the moment and they&#8217;ve done so much for the internet.</p>
<p>As for their monopolistic plans &#8211; by devaluing link exchanges and paid links, they&#8217;ll effectively generate more adwords customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Jabs</title>
		<link>http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Jabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 02:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thorschrock.com/2007/05/09/give-or-sell-links-on-your-blog-google-will-stop-you-soon/#comment-837</guid>
		<description>This sounds like a huge opportunity to me.

It&#039;s funny though, the more time goes by, and the &quot;bigger&quot; Google gets...the more they start to appear Microsoft-like.  When Google was first starting out, everyone was in their corner, but as time goes by, they start doing little things here &amp; there that piss people off, and I&#039;ve been seeing more &amp; more disdain toward Google...

Per the article, I agree that this algorithm could not be implemented overnight &amp; I&#039;m not too worried about it.  Once it comes out, people will find a way to get done what they want to get done.  And like I said in my first statement, it sounds like a huge opportunity to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a huge opportunity to me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny though, the more time goes by, and the &#8220;bigger&#8221; Google gets&#8230;the more they start to appear Microsoft-like.  When Google was first starting out, everyone was in their corner, but as time goes by, they start doing little things here &amp; there that piss people off, and I&#8217;ve been seeing more &amp; more disdain toward Google&#8230;</p>
<p>Per the article, I agree that this algorithm could not be implemented overnight &amp; I&#8217;m not too worried about it.  Once it comes out, people will find a way to get done what they want to get done.  And like I said in my first statement, it sounds like a huge opportunity to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
